Use of Equity Compensation to Retain High Level Employees

Equity compensation, such as stock options, restricted stock units, and performance shares, are often used to retain high level employees. Equity compensation can be an incredibly useful tool for retaining quality employees, but if the equity compensation is not awarded properly, litigation can result. Employers and boards of directors should be aware of the risks associated with equity compensation in order to avoid litigation and to protect themselves in the event that litigation results.

What is Equity Compensation?

Equity compensation consists of granting certain employees stock options with the right to exercise those rights at a predetermined price. The right to exercise stock options vests over time so the employee gains control over the stock option once he or she has been employed by the company for a specific period of time or has fulfilled a certain performance milestone.

Equity compensation is frequently used by startup companies to attract employees since the business may lack the capital to compensate employees through a traditional salary. But equity compensation is also used to retain high-level employees in established companies.

Common Sources of Business Disputes and Litigation

Business disputes regarding equity compensation often arise following termination of the employee who has received the equity compensation. Some common disputes that result in business litigation include:

  • Vesting and exercise. Disputes regarding when the stock options vest and when the employee can exercise their rights to the equity compensation units often arise.

  • Stock plan administration, including control and exercise rights over stock units.

  • Bankruptcy. Disputes regarding the inclusion of equity compensation in the bankruptcy estate may arise in the event that the company faces financial difficulties prior to the vesting or exercise of the rights.

  • Allegations of corporate waste. Equity compensation awarded to directors could be viewed as a corporate waste of assets that survives the “business judgment rule” if the directors have a financial interest in the equity compensation awards. For instance, a Delaware Chancery Court recently held that an allegation of corporate waste could survive a motion to dismiss because the directors granted restricted stock units to themselves.

  • Divorce. Because equity compensation is a common tool for closely-held businesses, including business partnerships, disputes can arise when a partner or equity employee divorces regarding whether the equity compensation is included in the marital estate.

What to do in the Event of an Equity Compensation Business Dispute

The terms and requirements of equity compensation can be incredibly complex with far-reaching financial and legal implications. If your company is involved a business dispute regarding equity compensation, you may wish to consult with a knowledgeable business litigation lawyer like the Chicago business litigators at Lubin Austermuehle.

Our Chicago business law attorneys focus on representing clients who are facing complex business disputes, including disputes regarding equity compensation. Our strong knowledge of the law and our vast litigation experience enables our Chicago business litigation attorneys to quickly analyze the strengths and weaknesses of your case. Contact our office at 630-333-0333 to learn more about equity compensation business disputes. You can also contact us online.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
"I was referred to Peter Lubin from someone in the car business to handle a law suit. From the moment I made the appointment Peter and his staff were outstanding. This wasn't an easy case, most lawyers had turned me down. However, Peter took the time to meet with me and review everything. He took on the case, and constantly communicated with me about updates and case information. We beat this non-compete agreement case in record time. I would use him again and recommend him to my closest family and friends. 5 stars is not enough to thank him for his service." Sebastian R.
★★★★★
"I worked on two occasions with Peter Lubin and his staff. They took their time with me and discussed each and every item in detail. The group makes you feel like you are part of the family and not just another hourly charge. I recommend Peter to anyone who asks me for a referral. If you are looking for a top notch attorney at a reasonable rate, look no further than Lubin Austermuehle." Kurt A.
★★★★★
"Excellent law firm. My case was a complicated arbitration dispute from another state. Was handled with utmost professionalism and decency. Mr. Peter Lubin was able to successfully resolve the case on my behalf and got me a very favorable settlement. Would recommend to anyone looking for a serious law firm. Great staff and great lawyers!" Albey L.
★★★★★
"I have known Peter Lubin for over 30 years. He has represented me on occasion with sound legal advice. He is a shrewd and tough negotiator leading to positive outcomes and averting prolonged legal hassles in court. He comes from a family with a legal pedigree and deep roots in Chicago's top legal community. You want him on your case. You need him on your opponents case. He won't stop fighting until he wins." Christopher G.
★★★★★
"Peter and his team helped us with an auto fraud case. They communicated well (timely and very responsive), investigated deeply, and negotiated a very good settlement. We were able to resolve our significant issue without a large burden and in a manner that allowed for us to come out ahead. I'd recommend Peter and his team strongly!" R.J. Callahan
★★★★★
"Peter was really nice and helpful when I came to him with an initial question about a non-compete. Would definitely reach out again, recommended to everyone." Johannes B.