Severance Agreements

In an economy where many people are afraid of layoffs, a good severance agreement can help cushion the blow. Although not every company has a formal severance policy, most have at least an informal policy. Sometimes the severance package will be included in the employment agreement or in the offer letter. Other times a company will not mention the subject until the worker’s employment with the company is terminated. If an offer letter or employment agreement does not include a severance package, an employee can ask what the company's termination policy is before signing on. The company may respond by revising the employee agreement to include a severance package. In any case, it does not hurt the employee to ask the question at that stage. Our Chicago severance agreement lawyers can advise you on any matters that may arise during this process.

Severance agreements were originally put in place to protect the newly unemployed, particularly those whose employment is terminated without cause. "Without cause" means that the employee did not fail to fulfill the duties of the position or fall short of the company's requirements of conduct in any way. Rather, a termination without cause could be a layoff for budgetary reasons or as a result of a merger. If a severance package is not included when the employee is first hired, the employee can broach the subject at the time of termination. If the termination is without cause, the employee has a much higher likelihood of being able to negotiate for a severance package with better terms.

The size of a severance package varies greatly, mostly depending upon the employee's status. For an employee working as a manager or in a lower position, a minimum of one to two weeks of base salary is standard. Sometimes the employee can negotiate for an additional week of base salary for each year that she worked for the company. For an employee at a director level, three to six months of base salary is a fairly standard severance package. Any type of vice president can usually expect six to twelve months of their base salary. In addition to salary, any of these employees might also get extended healthcare benefits, usually through COBRA, and sometimes 401(k) benefits.

A company might require an employee to sign a waiver surrendering all of her rights to sue the company as a requirement of the severance package. In the event that the employee violates this waiver, she would probably be required to return whatever was given to her as part of the severance package. The severance agreement attorneys at our Chicago firm can help you draft or enforce a waiver as needed. 

Employees negotiating a severance package should consider what their priorities are. If a worker thinks that she has a strong case against her former employer, she might decide to forgo the severance package in favor of a lawsuit. Others might prefer the certainty of the money that they can receive immediately from the severance package.

For some, making sure they leave their former employer on good terms is most important. An employee might be able to negotiate a favorable letter of recommendation from her former employer as part of a settlement package. This would help the employee feel more comfortable about leaving the position as it increases the likelihood that they will be able to find a new job.

The Chicago severance agreement attorneys at Lubin Austermuehle, P.C. have decades of experience handling severance agreements. Whether you are just starting a new position, or anticipating termination, it never hurts to consult a knowledgeable attorney concerning a severance package. With offices in Oak Brook Terrace and Chicago, Illinois, we have represented employees all over the country. To consult with an experienced severance agreement lawyer in Chicago today, you can email us online or give us a call at 630-333-0333.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
"I was referred to Peter Lubin from someone in the car business to handle a law suit. From the moment I made the appointment Peter and his staff were outstanding. This wasn't an easy case, most lawyers had turned me down. However, Peter took the time to meet with me and review everything. He took on the case, and constantly communicated with me about updates and case information. We beat this non-compete agreement case in record time. I would use him again and recommend him to my closest family and friends. 5 stars is not enough to thank him for his service." Sebastian R.
★★★★★
"I worked on two occasions with Peter Lubin and his staff. They took their time with me and discussed each and every item in detail. The group makes you feel like you are part of the family and not just another hourly charge. I recommend Peter to anyone who asks me for a referral. If you are looking for a top notch attorney at a reasonable rate, look no further than Lubin Austermuehle." Kurt A.
★★★★★
"Excellent law firm. My case was a complicated arbitration dispute from another state. Was handled with utmost professionalism and decency. Mr. Peter Lubin was able to successfully resolve the case on my behalf and got me a very favorable settlement. Would recommend to anyone looking for a serious law firm. Great staff and great lawyers!" Albey L.
★★★★★
"I have known Peter Lubin for over 30 years. He has represented me on occasion with sound legal advice. He is a shrewd and tough negotiator leading to positive outcomes and averting prolonged legal hassles in court. He comes from a family with a legal pedigree and deep roots in Chicago's top legal community. You want him on your case. You need him on your opponents case. He won't stop fighting until he wins." Christopher G.
★★★★★
"Peter and his team helped us with an auto fraud case. They communicated well (timely and very responsive), investigated deeply, and negotiated a very good settlement. We were able to resolve our significant issue without a large burden and in a manner that allowed for us to come out ahead. I'd recommend Peter and his team strongly!" R.J. Callahan
★★★★★
"Peter was really nice and helpful when I came to him with an initial question about a non-compete. Would definitely reach out again, recommended to everyone." Johannes B.